Recently I am noticing the Syrian chemical-bombing and its consequences. Noticeably USA is so much interested in warning Syria's actions by a 'little' missile attacks. I do not understand why USA is jumping on this issue so much. It is acceptable if UN put Syria's leader (Assad) in court and give proper punishment. Why would USA strike a country which is already burning? This is total crappy idea. If USA is really concerned about Syria's citizens, then it should not do any missile attack, which will kill more Syrian citizen.
Anyway, Syria is backed by Iran (who is already an anti-USA country). Moreover Russia and China warned against attacks on Syria (because those countries have steel balls, unlike India). Now if USA strike Syria then there will be a big war. USA jumped in without thinking the depth of the issue. Now Obama says 'I have not yet decided on Syria attack'.. ha ha it is really funny !!! Also USA give lame excuses to its fear saying 'USA congress members did not support the attack'. So this is a (crappy) reason mentioned for USA's inaction. Any one who understand the world politics will know USA is afraid to take action.
It is happy to see USA is afraid of other nations (at last). It is only legal for UN to inquire and punish the persons behind chemical-attacks (who knows it might be USA's secret agent in Syria). USA has no rights to enter into other country's civil issues.
